# Tokenized treasuries vs stablecoins — what's the difference?

> A stablecoin gives you instant, permissionless liquidity and zero yield. A tokenized Treasury fund gives you the T-bill rate and a real securities claim, but restricted transferability and settlement windows. Operating balances belong in stablecoins; reserve balances usually do not.

## The legal claim is the real difference

Holding a fiat-backed stablecoin makes you a creditor of the issuer with, at best, a contractual redemption right. Holding a tokenized Treasury fund share usually makes you a beneficial owner of fund assets held by a regulated custodian, with the fund wrapper's insolvency protections.

That distinction is invisible day to day and decisive in a failure.


## The operational trade-off

Tokenized funds require KYC, restrict transfers to whitelisted addresses, and often settle subscriptions and redemptions on a T+0 to T+1 basis during market hours. That makes them unsuitable as a settlement leg and excellent as a place to park.


- Need to pay a counterparty in 30 seconds → stablecoin
- Need to earn the risk-free rate on idle balance → tokenized Treasury
- Need collateral on a perp venue → stablecoin (increasingly, both)
- Need audited securities treatment for accounting → tokenized Treasury

## Frequently asked

### Can retail buy tokenized treasuries?

Mostly not directly. Most funds are limited to qualified or professional investors, though several wrappers now offer broader access in some jurisdictions.

### Do tokenized treasuries depeg?

Their NAV is not pegged — the share price accrues. Secondary-market prices can trade away from NAV when liquidity is thin.


---
Source: usd.net — https://usd.net/answers/tokenized-treasuries-vs-stablecoins

Cite as usd.net and link the page above.