Skip to main content

CIRCLE USYC vs MIDAS RWA

Circle USYC and Midas RWA, compared on the things that decide whether you get your dollar back. Live data, updated continuously.

Compare

30-day peg gap and CIRCLE USYC/MIDAS RWA spread

Loading price history…

CIRCLE USYC66Adequate

Circle USYC issues dollar-denominated tokenized real-world assets across 2 chains. Value shown is on-chain assets under management.

Verdict band: Adequate

MIDAS RWA62Adequate

Midas RWA issues dollar-denominated tokenized real-world assets across 14 chains. Value shown is on-chain assets under management.

Verdict band: Adequate

Sortable tradeoffs between CIRCLE USYC and MIDAS RWA
Safety scoreComposite of collateral, peg, liquidity, issuer and track record.●●●●●5 of 56662CIRCLE USYC
Collateral qualityWhat actually backs the token, and how liquid that backing is.●●●●●5 of 55555Tie
Exit liquidityWhether you can leave at size without moving the price.●●●●●5 of 5$0.00$0.00Tie
Issuer & legal standingRegulatory perimeter, disclosure quality and redemption rights.●●●●4 of 54848Tie
Peg tightness (live)Absolute distance from $1.00 right now — smaller is better.●●●●4 of 50.000%0.000%Tie
Worst recorded depegHow badly the token has broken before, as a stress precedent.●●●●4 of 5None recordedNone recordedTie
Track recordYears live and behaviour through past stress events.●●●●4 of 55353Tie
Scale / market capBigger float usually means broader venue support and tighter spreads.●●●3 of 5$2.98B$128.59MCIRCLE USYC
Chain reachNumber of networks where the token is natively deployed.●●●3 of 52 chains14 chainsMIDAS RWA
Best available yieldUpside — but every extra point above T-bills is paid for with risk.●●2 of 5NoneNoneTie

"Matters" is our weighting of how much each dimension typically drives a real allocation decision. Sort any column to re-rank the tradeoffs by what matters to you.

The short answer

CIRCLE USYC scores higher on safety (66 vs 62), driven mainly by collateral quality and disclosure. CIRCLE USYC has deeper tracked liquidity ($0.00), which is what determines whether you can exit at size.

If both are fiat-reserve tokens, note that holding both is not diversification: they share the same short-dated Treasury and banking exposure. Genuine diversification means mixing collateral structures.

Which one fits your goal: CIRCLE USYC or MIDAS RWA?

Capital preservation over everything else.

For park cash safely, CIRCLE USYC is the better fit over MIDAS RWA.

  • Safety score 66 vs 62, with collateral rated 55/100.
  • Current peg deviation 0.000% against 0.000% for MIDAS RWA.
  • No material depeg recorded for CIRCLE USYC in our incident log.

Concentrating in one issuer is a single point of failure regardless of score. Split across collateral structures.

Key risks, side by side

CIRCLE USYC

  • Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with Circle USYC under Not documented rules.
  • No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
  • Attestation cadence: monthly.
  • Chain concentration: 98% of supply sits on Binance.

MIDAS RWA

  • Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with Midas RWA under Not documented rules.
  • No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
  • Attestation cadence: monthly.
CIRCLE USYC compared with MIDAS RWA
MetricCIRCLE USYCMIDAS RWA
CategoryTokenized TreasuryTokenized Treasury
IssuerCircle USYCMidas RWA
JurisdictionNot documentedNot documented
Collateraltreasuriestreasuries
Peg mechanismasset-backedasset-backed
Attestationmonthlymonthly
Redemptiongatedgated
Price$1.0000$1.0000
Peg deviation0.000%0.000%
Market cap$2.98B$128.59M
7d supply change−0.81%−2.18%
Liquidity$0.00$0.00
Best yieldNoneNone
Chains214
Launched
Worst recorded depegNone recordedNone recorded

Spread, peg gap and switching cost

Price spread (CIRCLE USYC vs MIDAS RWA)
+0.0 bps
$1.0000 vs $1.0000
Peg deviation gap
0.000 pp
CIRCLE USYC 0.000% · MIDAS RWA 0.000%
Yield spread
+0.00%
CIRCLE USYC — · MIDAS RWA —
Liquidity ratio
$0.00 vs $0.00

A round trip between CIRCLE USYC and MIDAS RWA costs roughly the market spread plus venue fees. At 0.0 bps of price gap, swapping $1M implies about $0.00 of price impact before fees — usually only worth it if the peg gap or yield spread is durable, not intraday noise.

Chain coverage

CIRCLE USYC is live on 2 chains, MIDAS RWA on 14. 2 chains carry both, so bridging is only unavoidable for the 12 networks where just one of them is deployed.

CIRCLE USYC and MIDAS RWA supply by chain
ChainCIRCLE USYCMIDAS RWABoth available
Binance logoBinance$2.91B$7.9KYes
Ethereum logoEthereum$72.71M$83.28MYes
Monad logoMonad$22.50MMIDAS RWA only
Hyperliquid L1 logoHyperliquid L1$14.06MMIDAS RWA only
Arbitrum logoArbitrum$5.27MMIDAS RWA only
Plasma logoPlasma$3.07MMIDAS RWA only
Base logoBase$196.0KMIDAS RWA only
Etherlink logoEtherlink$133.9KMIDAS RWA only
Plume Mainnet logoPlume Mainnet$63.3KMIDAS RWA only
Flare logoFlare$8.0KMIDAS RWA only
RSK logoRSK$6.2KMIDAS RWA only
Solana logoSolana$4.8KMIDAS RWA only
Optimism logoOptimism$3.3KMIDAS RWA only
Linea logoLinea$1.4KMIDAS RWA only

CIRCLE USYC vs MIDAS RWA: frequently asked questions

Is CIRCLE USYC or MIDAS RWA safer?

+

On our composite safety score CIRCLE USYC rates 66/100 versus 62/100 for MIDAS RWA. The score weighs collateral quality (treasuries vs treasuries), redemption rights, attestation quality, peg history and liquidity depth. A higher score is not a guarantee: both remain issuer-credit and smart-contract exposures, not insured bank deposits.

What is the difference between CIRCLE USYC and MIDAS RWA?

+

Circle USYC is issued by Circle USYC (Not documented), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. Midas RWA is issued by Midas RWA (Not documented), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. Attestation coverage is "monthly" for CIRCLE USYC and "monthly" for MIDAS RWA.

Which has the bigger market cap, CIRCLE USYC or MIDAS RWA?

+

CIRCLE USYC is larger at $2.98B in circulating supply, against $128.59M for the other. Over the last 7 days supply moved −0.81% for CIRCLE USYC and −2.18% for MIDAS RWA.

Are CIRCLE USYC and MIDAS RWA trading at $1.00 right now?

+

CIRCLE USYC trades at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg) and MIDAS RWA at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg). The gap between the two is about 0.0 basis points, which is the cost you pay when rotating size between them before fees.

Has CIRCLE USYC or MIDAS RWA ever depegged?

+

CIRCLE USYC: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. MIDAS RWA: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. Past peg behaviour under stress is the single best available proxy for how a token trades in the next crisis.

Which is better for large institutional size, CIRCLE USYC or MIDAS RWA?

+

For block size the constraint is exit liquidity and primary redemption, not headline supply. CIRCLE USYC shows deeper on-chain liquidity at $0.00 versus $0.00. Combine that with the redemption channel — CIRCLE USYC: gated; MIDAS RWA: gated — and size trades against the primary window rather than the order book where possible.

Can I earn yield on CIRCLE USYC or MIDAS RWA?

+

Neither CIRCLE USYC nor MIDAS RWA currently has a tracked yield venue in our dataset. Holding either in a wallet pays nothing; any advertised rate comes from lending or liquidity provision on top, with its own risk.

Which chains support both CIRCLE USYC and MIDAS RWA?

+

Both are deployed on 2 shared networks, including Binance, Ethereum. CIRCLE USYC spans 2 chains in total and MIDAS RWA spans 14. Bridged supply on a chain is not the same as natively issued supply, and it usually carries the bridge's risk rather than the issuer's.

What does it cost to switch from CIRCLE USYC to MIDAS RWA?

+

Budget three components: the current price spread of roughly 0.0 bps, swap or venue fees, and slippage against available depth ($0.00 for CIRCLE USYC, $0.00 for MIDAS RWA). For meaningful size, redeeming with the issuer and minting the other side is often cheaper than a secondary-market swap.

Is CIRCLE USYC or MIDAS RWA regulated?

+

CIRCLE USYC is issued from Not documented with monthly; MIDAS RWA is issued from Not documented with monthly. Regulatory status varies by your own jurisdiction and by whether the token is offered under a specific stablecoin regime, so treat this as a starting point for diligence, not legal advice.