CUSD vs PATHUSD
Cap cUSD and PathUSD, compared on the things that decide whether you get your dollar back. Live data, updated continuously.
30-day peg gap and CUSD/PATHUSD spread
Loading price history…
Cap cUSD is a dollar-denominated token tracked across 3 chains. No verified issuer disclosure is on file, so its collateral and legal structure score conservatively.
Verdict band: Adequate
PathUSD is a dollar-denominated token tracked across 1 chains. No verified issuer disclosure is on file, so its collateral and legal structure score conservatively.
Verdict band: Caution
| Safety scoreComposite of collateral, peg, liquidity, issuer and track record. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 70 | 53 | CUSD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collateral qualityWhat actually backs the token, and how liquid that backing is. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 55 | 55 | Tie |
| Exit liquidityWhether you can leave at size without moving the price. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | $131.89M | $23.64M | CUSD |
| Issuer & legal standingRegulatory perimeter, disclosure quality and redemption rights. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 48 | 48 | Tie |
| Peg tightness (live)Absolute distance from $1.00 right now — smaller is better. | ●●●●4 of 5 | −0.020% | +1.131% | CUSD |
| Worst recorded depegHow badly the token has broken before, as a stress precedent. | ●●●●4 of 5 | None recorded | None recorded | Tie |
| Track recordYears live and behaviour through past stress events. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 53 | 53 | Tie |
| Scale / market capBigger float usually means broader venue support and tighter spreads. | ●●●3 of 5 | $90.12M | $31.04M | CUSD |
| Chain reachNumber of networks where the token is natively deployed. | ●●●3 of 5 | 3 chains | 1 chains | CUSD |
| Best available yieldUpside — but every extra point above T-bills is paid for with risk. | ●●2 of 5 | 0.00% | None | CUSD |
"Matters" is our weighting of how much each dimension typically drives a real allocation decision. Sort any column to re-rank the tradeoffs by what matters to you.
The short answer
CUSD scores higher on safety (70 vs 53), driven mainly by collateral quality and disclosure. CUSD has deeper tracked liquidity ($131.89M), which is what determines whether you can exit at size. CUSD currently earns up to 0.00% — remember that any rate above the T-bill yield is payment for a risk.
If both are fiat-reserve tokens, note that holding both is not diversification: they share the same short-dated Treasury and banking exposure. Genuine diversification means mixing collateral structures.
Which one fits your goal: CUSD or PATHUSD?
Capital preservation over everything else.
For park cash safely, CUSD is the better fit over PATHUSD.
- Safety score 70 vs 53, with collateral rated 55/100.
- Current peg deviation -0.020% against 1.131% for PATHUSD.
- No material depeg recorded for CUSD in our incident log.
Concentrating in one issuer is a single point of failure regardless of score. Split across collateral structures.
Key risks, side by side
CUSD
- Collateral volatility: a fast drawdown in backing assets can force liquidations.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Limited public attestation of reserves.
- Yield venue risk: 0.00% is earned outside the token itself.
- Chain concentration: 100% of supply sits on Ethereum.
PATHUSD
- Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with Undisclosed under Not documented rules.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Limited public attestation of reserves.
- Chain concentration: 100% of supply sits on Tempo.
| Metric | CUSD | PATHUSD |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Stablecoin | Stablecoin |
| Issuer | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Jurisdiction | Not documented | Not documented |
| Collateral | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Peg mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Attestation | none | none |
| Redemption | market-only | market-only |
| Price | $0.9998 | $1.0113 |
| Peg deviation | −0.020% | +1.131% |
| Market cap | $90.12M | $31.04M |
| 7d supply change | −3.40% | −6.33% |
| Liquidity | $131.89M | $23.64M |
| Best yield | 0.00% (moola-market · Celo) | None |
| Chains | 3 | 1 |
| Launched | — | — |
| Worst recorded depeg | None recorded | None recorded |
Spread, peg gap and switching cost
- Price spread (CUSD vs PATHUSD)
- -113.8 bps
- $0.9998 vs $1.0113
- Peg deviation gap
- -1.111 pp
- CUSD −0.020% · PATHUSD +1.131%
- Yield spread
- +0.00%
- CUSD 0.00% · PATHUSD —
- Liquidity ratio
- 5.58×
- $131.89M vs $23.64M
A round trip between CUSD and PATHUSD costs roughly the market spread plus venue fees. At 113.8 bps of price gap, swapping $1M implies about $11.4K of price impact before fees — usually only worth it if the peg gap or yield spread is durable, not intraday noise.
Chain coverage
CUSD is live on 3 chains, PATHUSD on 1. 1 chains carry both, so bridging is only unavoidable for the 2 networks where just one of them is deployed.
| Chain | CUSD | PATHUSD | Both available |
|---|---|---|---|
| $90.04M | — | CUSD only | |
| $50.3K | $31.04M | Yes | |
| $26.7K | — | CUSD only |
CUSD vs PATHUSD: frequently asked questions
Is CUSD or PATHUSD safer?
+
On our composite safety score CUSD rates 70/100 versus 53/100 for PATHUSD. The score weighs collateral quality (crypto-backed vs fiat-backed), redemption rights, attestation quality, peg history and liquidity depth. A higher score is not a guarantee: both remain issuer-credit and smart-contract exposures, not insured bank deposits.
What is the difference between CUSD and PATHUSD?
+
Cap cUSD is issued by Undisclosed (Not documented), backed by crypto-backed, with redemption terms: market-only. PathUSD is issued by Undisclosed (Not documented), backed by fiat-backed, with redemption terms: market-only. Attestation coverage is "none" for CUSD and "none" for PATHUSD.
Which has the bigger market cap, CUSD or PATHUSD?
+
CUSD is larger at $90.12M in circulating supply, against $31.04M for the other. Over the last 7 days supply moved −3.40% for CUSD and −6.33% for PATHUSD.
Are CUSD and PATHUSD trading at $1.00 right now?
+
CUSD trades at $0.9998 (−0.020% off peg) and PATHUSD at $1.0113 (+1.131% off peg). The gap between the two is about 113.8 basis points, which is the cost you pay when rotating size between them before fees.
Has CUSD or PATHUSD ever depegged?
+
CUSD: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. PATHUSD: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. Past peg behaviour under stress is the single best available proxy for how a token trades in the next crisis.
Which is better for large institutional size, CUSD or PATHUSD?
+
For block size the constraint is exit liquidity and primary redemption, not headline supply. CUSD shows deeper on-chain liquidity at $131.89M versus $23.64M. Combine that with the redemption channel — CUSD: market-only; PATHUSD: market-only — and size trades against the primary window rather than the order book where possible.
Can I earn yield on CUSD or PATHUSD?
+
CUSD currently shows the higher rate at 0.00% via moola-market · Celo, against no tracked rate for PATHUSD. Neither token pays interest by holding it in a wallet: the yield comes from lending, liquidity provision or a wrapped yield-bearing version, each with its own counterparty and contract risk.
Which chains support both CUSD and PATHUSD?
+
Both are deployed on 1 shared network, including Tempo. CUSD spans 3 chains in total and PATHUSD spans 1. Bridged supply on a chain is not the same as natively issued supply, and it usually carries the bridge's risk rather than the issuer's.
What does it cost to switch from CUSD to PATHUSD?
+
Budget three components: the current price spread of roughly 113.8 bps, swap or venue fees, and slippage against available depth ($131.89M for CUSD, $23.64M for PATHUSD). For meaningful size, redeeming with the issuer and minting the other side is often cheaper than a secondary-market swap.
Is CUSD or PATHUSD regulated?
+
CUSD is issued from Not documented with none; PATHUSD is issued from Not documented with none. Regulatory status varies by your own jurisdiction and by whether the token is offered under a specific stablecoin regime, so treat this as a starting point for diligence, not legal advice.