D vs USDS
Saga Dollar and Sky Dollar, compared on the things that decide whether you get your dollar back. Live data, updated continuously.
30-day peg gap and D/USDS spread
Loading price history…
Saga Dollar is a dollar-denominated token tracked across 1 chains. No verified issuer disclosure is on file, so its collateral and legal structure score conservatively.
Verdict band: Adequate
Sky's upgraded dollar, overcollateralised on-chain by crypto assets and tokenised real-world credit. Collateral is verifiable on-chain in real time; a large share is now allocated to Treasury-backed exposure.
Verdict band: Robust
| Safety scoreComposite of collateral, peg, liquidity, issuer and track record. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 73 | 88 | USDS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collateral qualityWhat actually backs the token, and how liquid that backing is. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 55 | 84 | USDS |
| Exit liquidityWhether you can leave at size without moving the price. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | $35.92B | $7.78B | D |
| Issuer & legal standingRegulatory perimeter, disclosure quality and redemption rights. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 48 | 82 | USDS |
| Peg tightness (live)Absolute distance from $1.00 right now — smaller is better. | ●●●●4 of 5 | −0.025% | +0.011% | USDS |
| Worst recorded depegHow badly the token has broken before, as a stress precedent. | ●●●●4 of 5 | None recorded | None recorded | Tie |
| Track recordYears live and behaviour through past stress events. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 53 | 61 | USDS |
| Scale / market capBigger float usually means broader venue support and tighter spreads. | ●●●3 of 5 | $10.39M | $6.72B | USDS |
| Chain reachNumber of networks where the token is natively deployed. | ●●●3 of 5 | 1 chains | 4 chains | USDS |
| Best available yieldUpside — but every extra point above T-bills is paid for with risk. | ●●2 of 5 | None | 5.82% | USDS |
"Matters" is our weighting of how much each dimension typically drives a real allocation decision. Sort any column to re-rank the tradeoffs by what matters to you.
The short answer
USDS scores higher on safety (88 vs 73), driven mainly by collateral quality and disclosure. D has deeper tracked liquidity ($35.92B), which is what determines whether you can exit at size. USDS currently earns up to 5.82% — remember that any rate above the T-bill yield is payment for a risk.
If both are fiat-reserve tokens, note that holding both is not diversification: they share the same short-dated Treasury and banking exposure. Genuine diversification means mixing collateral structures.
Which one fits your goal: D or USDS?
Capital preservation over everything else.
For park cash safely, USDS is the better fit over D.
- Safety score 88 vs 73, with collateral rated 84/100.
- Current peg deviation 0.011% against -0.025% for D.
- No material depeg recorded for USDS in our incident log.
Concentrating in one issuer is a single point of failure regardless of score. Split across collateral structures.
Key risks, side by side
D
- Collateral volatility: a fast drawdown in backing assets can force liquidations.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Limited public attestation of reserves.
- Chain concentration: 100% of supply sits on Saga.
USDS
- Collateral volatility: a fast drawdown in backing assets can force liquidations.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Attestation cadence: onchain.
- Yield venue risk: 5.82% is earned outside the token itself.
- Chain concentration: 98% of supply sits on Ethereum.
| Metric | D | USDS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Stablecoin | Stablecoin |
| Issuer | Undisclosed | Sky (formerly MakerDAO) |
| Jurisdiction | Not documented | Decentralised / Cayman foundation |
| Collateral | crypto-backed | crypto-overcollateralized |
| Peg mechanism | crypto-backed | crypto-backed |
| Attestation | none | onchain |
| Redemption | market-only | direct |
| Price | $0.9998 | $1.0001 |
| Peg deviation | −0.025% | +0.011% |
| Market cap | $10.39M | $6.72B |
| 7d supply change | 0.00% | +1.15% |
| Liquidity | $35.92B | $7.78B |
| Best yield | None | 5.82% (sky-lending · Ethereum) |
| Chains | 1 | 4 |
| Launched | — | 2024 |
| Worst recorded depeg | None recorded | None recorded |
Spread, peg gap and switching cost
- Price spread (D vs USDS)
- -3.6 bps
- $0.9998 vs $1.0001
- Peg deviation gap
- 0.014 pp
- D −0.025% · USDS +0.011%
- Yield spread
- -5.82%
- D — · USDS 5.82%
- Liquidity ratio
- 4.62×
- $35.92B vs $7.78B
A round trip between D and USDS costs roughly the market spread plus venue fees. At 3.6 bps of price gap, swapping $1M implies about $361.16 of price impact before fees — usually only worth it if the peg gap or yield spread is durable, not intraday noise.
Historical context
Track record is the part of a stablecoin you cannot model — it has to be observed. Here is how D and USDS have actually behaved since launch, including every stress event we have on record.
- USDS
Sky Dollar goes live.
Chain coverage
D is live on 1 chains, USDS on 4. 0 chains carry both, so bridging is only unavoidable for the 5 networks where just one of them is deployed.
| Chain | D | USDS | Both available |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | $6.61B | USDS only | |
| — | $99.78M | USDS only | |
| $10.39M | — | D only | |
| — | $8.91M | USDS only | |
| — | $2.36M | USDS only |
D vs USDS: frequently asked questions
Is D or USDS safer?
+
On our composite safety score USDS rates 88/100 versus 73/100 for D. The score weighs collateral quality (crypto-overcollateralized vs crypto-backed), redemption rights, attestation quality, peg history and liquidity depth. A higher score is not a guarantee: both remain issuer-credit and smart-contract exposures, not insured bank deposits.
What is the difference between D and USDS?
+
Saga Dollar is issued by Undisclosed (Not documented), backed by crypto-backed, with redemption terms: market-only. Sky Dollar is issued by Sky (formerly MakerDAO) (Decentralised / Cayman foundation), backed by crypto-overcollateralized, with redemption terms: direct. Attestation coverage is "none" for D and "onchain" for USDS.
Which has the bigger market cap, D or USDS?
+
USDS is larger at $6.72B in circulating supply, against $10.39M for the other. Over the last 7 days supply moved 0.00% for D and +1.15% for USDS.
Are D and USDS trading at $1.00 right now?
+
D trades at $0.9998 (−0.025% off peg) and USDS at $1.0001 (+0.011% off peg). The gap between the two is about 3.6 basis points, which is the cost you pay when rotating size between them before fees.
Has D or USDS ever depegged?
+
D: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. USDS: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. Past peg behaviour under stress is the single best available proxy for how a token trades in the next crisis.
Which is better for large institutional size, D or USDS?
+
For block size the constraint is exit liquidity and primary redemption, not headline supply. D shows deeper on-chain liquidity at $35.92B versus $7.78B. Combine that with the redemption channel — D: market-only; USDS: direct — and size trades against the primary window rather than the order book where possible.
Can I earn yield on D or USDS?
+
USDS currently shows the higher rate at 5.82% via sky-lending · Ethereum, against no tracked rate for D. Neither token pays interest by holding it in a wallet: the yield comes from lending, liquidity provision or a wrapped yield-bearing version, each with its own counterparty and contract risk.
Which chains support both D and USDS?
+
They currently share no common network in our data: D is deployed on 1 chain(s) and USDS on 4. Moving between them requires a bridge or a centralised venue.
What does it cost to switch from D to USDS?
+
Budget three components: the current price spread of roughly 3.6 bps, swap or venue fees, and slippage against available depth ($35.92B for D, $7.78B for USDS). For meaningful size, redeeming with the issuer and minting the other side is often cheaper than a secondary-market swap.
Is D or USDS regulated?
+
D is issued from Not documented with none; USDS is issued from Decentralised / Cayman foundation with onchain. Regulatory status varies by your own jurisdiction and by whether the token is offered under a specific stablecoin regime, so treat this as a starting point for diligence, not legal advice.