MATRIXDOCK X vs SPIKO
MatrixDock XAUM and Spiko, compared on the things that decide whether you get your dollar back. Live data, updated continuously.
30-day peg gap and MATRIXDOCK X/SPIKO spread
Loading price history…
MatrixDock XAUM issues dollar-denominated tokenized real-world assets across 5 chains. Value shown is on-chain assets under management.
Verdict band: Adequate
Spiko issues dollar-denominated tokenized real-world assets across 7 chains. Value shown is on-chain assets under management.
Verdict band: Adequate
| Safety scoreComposite of collateral, peg, liquidity, issuer and track record. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 61 | 66 | SPIKO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collateral qualityWhat actually backs the token, and how liquid that backing is. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 55 | 55 | Tie |
| Exit liquidityWhether you can leave at size without moving the price. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | $0.00 | $0.00 | Tie |
| Issuer & legal standingRegulatory perimeter, disclosure quality and redemption rights. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 48 | 48 | Tie |
| Peg tightness (live)Absolute distance from $1.00 right now — smaller is better. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 0.000% | 0.000% | Tie |
| Worst recorded depegHow badly the token has broken before, as a stress precedent. | ●●●●4 of 5 | None recorded | None recorded | Tie |
| Track recordYears live and behaviour through past stress events. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 53 | 53 | Tie |
| Scale / market capBigger float usually means broader venue support and tighter spreads. | ●●●3 of 5 | $66.10M | $2.46B | SPIKO |
| Chain reachNumber of networks where the token is natively deployed. | ●●●3 of 5 | 5 chains | 7 chains | SPIKO |
| Best available yieldUpside — but every extra point above T-bills is paid for with risk. | ●●2 of 5 | None | None | Tie |
"Matters" is our weighting of how much each dimension typically drives a real allocation decision. Sort any column to re-rank the tradeoffs by what matters to you.
The short answer
SPIKO scores higher on safety (66 vs 61), driven mainly by collateral quality and disclosure. MATRIXDOCK X has deeper tracked liquidity ($0.00), which is what determines whether you can exit at size.
If both are fiat-reserve tokens, note that holding both is not diversification: they share the same short-dated Treasury and banking exposure. Genuine diversification means mixing collateral structures.
Which one fits your goal: MATRIXDOCK X or SPIKO?
Capital preservation over everything else.
For park cash safely, SPIKO is the better fit over MATRIXDOCK X.
- Safety score 66 vs 61, with collateral rated 55/100.
- Current peg deviation 0.000% against 0.000% for MATRIXDOCK X.
- No material depeg recorded for SPIKO in our incident log.
Concentrating in one issuer is a single point of failure regardless of score. Split across collateral structures.
Key risks, side by side
MATRIXDOCK X
- Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with MatrixDock XAUM under Not documented rules.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Attestation cadence: monthly.
SPIKO
- Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with Spiko under Not documented rules.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Attestation cadence: monthly.
| Metric | MATRIXDOCK X | SPIKO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Tokenized Treasury | Tokenized Treasury |
| Issuer | MatrixDock XAUM | Spiko |
| Jurisdiction | Not documented | Not documented |
| Collateral | treasuries | treasuries |
| Peg mechanism | asset-backed | asset-backed |
| Attestation | monthly | monthly |
| Redemption | gated | gated |
| Price | $1.0000 | $1.0000 |
| Peg deviation | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Market cap | $66.10M | $2.46B |
| 7d supply change | −0.73% | +3.06% |
| Liquidity | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Best yield | None | None |
| Chains | 5 | 7 |
| Launched | — | — |
| Worst recorded depeg | None recorded | None recorded |
Spread, peg gap and switching cost
- Price spread (MATRIXDOCK X vs SPIKO)
- +0.0 bps
- $1.0000 vs $1.0000
- Peg deviation gap
- 0.000 pp
- MATRIXDOCK X 0.000% · SPIKO 0.000%
- Yield spread
- +0.00%
- MATRIXDOCK X — · SPIKO —
- Liquidity ratio
- —
- $0.00 vs $0.00
A round trip between MATRIXDOCK X and SPIKO costs roughly the market spread plus venue fees. At 0.0 bps of price gap, swapping $1M implies about $0.00 of price impact before fees — usually only worth it if the peg gap or yield spread is durable, not intraday noise.
Chain coverage
MATRIXDOCK X is live on 5 chains, SPIKO on 7. 1 chains carry both, so bridging is only unavoidable for the 10 networks where just one of them is deployed.
| Chain | MATRIXDOCK X | SPIKO | Both available |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | $1.52B | SPIKO only | |
| — | $470.95M | SPIKO only | |
| $23.47M | $215.34M | Yes | |
| — | $172.18M | SPIKO only | |
| — | $39.63M | SPIKO only | |
| — | $33.82M | SPIKO only | |
| $24.11M | — | MATRIXDOCK X only | |
| $11.61M | — | MATRIXDOCK X only | |
| $6.83M | — | MATRIXDOCK X only | |
| — | $4.91M | SPIKO only | |
| $81.1K | — | MATRIXDOCK X only |
MATRIXDOCK X vs SPIKO: frequently asked questions
Is MATRIXDOCK X or SPIKO safer?
+
On our composite safety score SPIKO rates 66/100 versus 61/100 for MATRIXDOCK X. The score weighs collateral quality (treasuries vs treasuries), redemption rights, attestation quality, peg history and liquidity depth. A higher score is not a guarantee: both remain issuer-credit and smart-contract exposures, not insured bank deposits.
What is the difference between MATRIXDOCK X and SPIKO?
+
MatrixDock XAUM is issued by MatrixDock XAUM (Not documented), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. Spiko is issued by Spiko (Not documented), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. Attestation coverage is "monthly" for MATRIXDOCK X and "monthly" for SPIKO.
Which has the bigger market cap, MATRIXDOCK X or SPIKO?
+
SPIKO is larger at $2.46B in circulating supply, against $66.10M for the other. Over the last 7 days supply moved −0.73% for MATRIXDOCK X and +3.06% for SPIKO.
Are MATRIXDOCK X and SPIKO trading at $1.00 right now?
+
MATRIXDOCK X trades at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg) and SPIKO at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg). The gap between the two is about 0.0 basis points, which is the cost you pay when rotating size between them before fees.
Has MATRIXDOCK X or SPIKO ever depegged?
+
MATRIXDOCK X: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. SPIKO: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. Past peg behaviour under stress is the single best available proxy for how a token trades in the next crisis.
Which is better for large institutional size, MATRIXDOCK X or SPIKO?
+
For block size the constraint is exit liquidity and primary redemption, not headline supply. MATRIXDOCK X shows deeper on-chain liquidity at $0.00 versus $0.00. Combine that with the redemption channel — MATRIXDOCK X: gated; SPIKO: gated — and size trades against the primary window rather than the order book where possible.
Can I earn yield on MATRIXDOCK X or SPIKO?
+
Neither MATRIXDOCK X nor SPIKO currently has a tracked yield venue in our dataset. Holding either in a wallet pays nothing; any advertised rate comes from lending or liquidity provision on top, with its own risk.
Which chains support both MATRIXDOCK X and SPIKO?
+
Both are deployed on 1 shared network, including Ethereum. MATRIXDOCK X spans 5 chains in total and SPIKO spans 7. Bridged supply on a chain is not the same as natively issued supply, and it usually carries the bridge's risk rather than the issuer's.
What does it cost to switch from MATRIXDOCK X to SPIKO?
+
Budget three components: the current price spread of roughly 0.0 bps, swap or venue fees, and slippage against available depth ($0.00 for MATRIXDOCK X, $0.00 for SPIKO). For meaningful size, redeeming with the issuer and minting the other side is often cheaper than a secondary-market swap.
Is MATRIXDOCK X or SPIKO regulated?
+
MATRIXDOCK X is issued from Not documented with monthly; SPIKO is issued from Not documented with monthly. Regulatory status varies by your own jurisdiction and by whether the token is offered under a specific stablecoin regime, so treat this as a starting point for diligence, not legal advice.