Skip to main content

ONDO vs VANECK TREAS

Ondo Yield Assets and VanEck Treasury Fund, compared on the things that decide whether you get your dollar back. Live data, updated continuously.

Compare

30-day peg gap and ONDO/VANECK TREAS spread

Loading price history…

ONDO66Adequate

Ondo Yield Assets issues dollar-denominated tokenized real-world assets across 10 chains. Value shown is on-chain assets under management.

Verdict band: Adequate

VANECK TREAS63Adequate

VanEck Treasury Fund issues dollar-denominated tokenized real-world assets across 4 chains. Value shown is on-chain assets under management.

Verdict band: Adequate

Sortable tradeoffs between ONDO and VANECK TREAS
Safety scoreComposite of collateral, peg, liquidity, issuer and track record.●●●●●5 of 56663ONDO
Collateral qualityWhat actually backs the token, and how liquid that backing is.●●●●●5 of 55555Tie
Exit liquidityWhether you can leave at size without moving the price.●●●●●5 of 5$0.00$0.00Tie
Issuer & legal standingRegulatory perimeter, disclosure quality and redemption rights.●●●●4 of 54848Tie
Peg tightness (live)Absolute distance from $1.00 right now — smaller is better.●●●●4 of 50.000%0.000%Tie
Worst recorded depegHow badly the token has broken before, as a stress precedent.●●●●4 of 5None recordedNone recordedTie
Track recordYears live and behaviour through past stress events.●●●●4 of 55353Tie
Scale / market capBigger float usually means broader venue support and tighter spreads.●●●3 of 5$2.52B$193.33MONDO
Chain reachNumber of networks where the token is natively deployed.●●●3 of 510 chains4 chainsONDO
Best available yieldUpside — but every extra point above T-bills is paid for with risk.●●2 of 5NoneNoneTie

"Matters" is our weighting of how much each dimension typically drives a real allocation decision. Sort any column to re-rank the tradeoffs by what matters to you.

The short answer

ONDO scores higher on safety (66 vs 63), driven mainly by collateral quality and disclosure. ONDO has deeper tracked liquidity ($0.00), which is what determines whether you can exit at size.

If both are fiat-reserve tokens, note that holding both is not diversification: they share the same short-dated Treasury and banking exposure. Genuine diversification means mixing collateral structures.

Which one fits your goal: ONDO or VANECK TREAS?

Capital preservation over everything else.

For park cash safely, ONDO edges out VANECK TREAS — but it is close enough that either works.

  • Safety score 66 vs 63, with collateral rated 55/100.
  • Current peg deviation 0.000% against 0.000% for VANECK TREAS.
  • No material depeg recorded for ONDO in our incident log.

Concentrating in one issuer is a single point of failure regardless of score. Split across collateral structures.

Key risks, side by side

ONDO

  • Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with Ondo Yield Assets under Not documented rules.
  • No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
  • Attestation cadence: monthly.

VANECK TREAS

  • Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with VanEck Treasury Fund under Not documented rules.
  • No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
  • Attestation cadence: monthly.
  • Chain concentration: 70% of supply sits on Avalanche.
ONDO compared with VANECK TREAS
MetricONDOVANECK TREAS
CategoryTokenized TreasuryTokenized Treasury
IssuerOndo Yield AssetsVanEck Treasury Fund
JurisdictionNot documentedNot documented
Collateraltreasuriestreasuries
Peg mechanismasset-backedasset-backed
Attestationmonthlymonthly
Redemptiongatedgated
Price$1.0000$1.0000
Peg deviation0.000%0.000%
Market cap$2.52B$193.33M
7d supply change−0.19%+0.07%
Liquidity$0.00$0.00
Best yieldNoneNone
Chains104
Launched
Worst recorded depegNone recordedNone recorded

Spread, peg gap and switching cost

Price spread (ONDO vs VANECK TREAS)
+0.0 bps
$1.0000 vs $1.0000
Peg deviation gap
0.000 pp
ONDO 0.000% · VANECK TREAS 0.000%
Yield spread
+0.00%
ONDO — · VANECK TREAS —
Liquidity ratio
$0.00 vs $0.00

A round trip between ONDO and VANECK TREAS costs roughly the market spread plus venue fees. At 0.0 bps of price gap, swapping $1M implies about $0.00 of price impact before fees — usually only worth it if the peg gap or yield spread is durable, not intraday noise.

Chain coverage

ONDO is live on 10 chains, VANECK TREAS on 4. 2 chains carry both, so bridging is only unavoidable for the 10 networks where just one of them is deployed.

ONDO and VANECK TREAS supply by chain
ChainONDOVANECK TREASBoth available
Ethereum logoEthereum$1.27B$21.68MYes
Stellar logoStellar$532.58MONDO only
Sei logoSei$257.34MONDO only
Ripple logoRipple$212.85MONDO only
Solana logoSolana$178.55M$13.93MYes
Avalanche logoAvalanche$136.22MVANECK TREAS only
Mantle logoMantle$28.49MONDO only
Binance logoBinance$21.50MVANECK TREAS only
Noble logoNoble$14.36MONDO only
Sui logoSui$14.00MONDO only
Arbitrum logoArbitrum$3.64MONDO only
Aptos logoAptos$2.10MONDO only

ONDO vs VANECK TREAS: frequently asked questions

Is ONDO or VANECK TREAS safer?

+

On our composite safety score ONDO rates 66/100 versus 63/100 for VANECK TREAS. The score weighs collateral quality (treasuries vs treasuries), redemption rights, attestation quality, peg history and liquidity depth. A higher score is not a guarantee: both remain issuer-credit and smart-contract exposures, not insured bank deposits.

What is the difference between ONDO and VANECK TREAS?

+

Ondo Yield Assets is issued by Ondo Yield Assets (Not documented), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. VanEck Treasury Fund is issued by VanEck Treasury Fund (Not documented), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. Attestation coverage is "monthly" for ONDO and "monthly" for VANECK TREAS.

Which has the bigger market cap, ONDO or VANECK TREAS?

+

ONDO is larger at $2.52B in circulating supply, against $193.33M for the other. Over the last 7 days supply moved −0.19% for ONDO and +0.07% for VANECK TREAS.

Are ONDO and VANECK TREAS trading at $1.00 right now?

+

ONDO trades at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg) and VANECK TREAS at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg). The gap between the two is about 0.0 basis points, which is the cost you pay when rotating size between them before fees.

Has ONDO or VANECK TREAS ever depegged?

+

ONDO: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. VANECK TREAS: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. Past peg behaviour under stress is the single best available proxy for how a token trades in the next crisis.

Which is better for large institutional size, ONDO or VANECK TREAS?

+

For block size the constraint is exit liquidity and primary redemption, not headline supply. ONDO shows deeper on-chain liquidity at $0.00 versus $0.00. Combine that with the redemption channel — ONDO: gated; VANECK TREAS: gated — and size trades against the primary window rather than the order book where possible.

Can I earn yield on ONDO or VANECK TREAS?

+

Neither ONDO nor VANECK TREAS currently has a tracked yield venue in our dataset. Holding either in a wallet pays nothing; any advertised rate comes from lending or liquidity provision on top, with its own risk.

Which chains support both ONDO and VANECK TREAS?

+

Both are deployed on 2 shared networks, including Ethereum, Solana. ONDO spans 10 chains in total and VANECK TREAS spans 4. Bridged supply on a chain is not the same as natively issued supply, and it usually carries the bridge's risk rather than the issuer's.

What does it cost to switch from ONDO to VANECK TREAS?

+

Budget three components: the current price spread of roughly 0.0 bps, swap or venue fees, and slippage against available depth ($0.00 for ONDO, $0.00 for VANECK TREAS). For meaningful size, redeeming with the issuer and minting the other side is often cheaper than a secondary-market swap.

Is ONDO or VANECK TREAS regulated?

+

ONDO is issued from Not documented with monthly; VANECK TREAS is issued from Not documented with monthly. Regulatory status varies by your own jurisdiction and by whether the token is offered under a specific stablecoin regime, so treat this as a starting point for diligence, not legal advice.