Skip to main content

U vs USD1

United Stables and World Liberty Financial USD, compared on the things that decide whether you get your dollar back. Live data, updated continuously.

Compare

30-day peg gap and U/USD1 spread

Loading price history…

U72Adequate

United Stables is a dollar-denominated token tracked across 4 chains. No verified issuer disclosure is on file, so its collateral and legal structure score conservatively.

Verdict band: Adequate

USD179Adequate

Treasury-backed dollar token with custody at a regulated US institution. Young track record and concentrated holder base.

Verdict band: Adequate

Sortable tradeoffs between U and USD1
Safety scoreComposite of collateral, peg, liquidity, issuer and track record.●●●●●5 of 57279USD1
Collateral qualityWhat actually backs the token, and how liquid that backing is.●●●●●5 of 55595USD1
Exit liquidityWhether you can leave at size without moving the price.●●●●●5 of 5$38.47B$283.68MU
Issuer & legal standingRegulatory perimeter, disclosure quality and redemption rights.●●●●4 of 54854USD1
Peg tightness (live)Absolute distance from $1.00 right now — smaller is better.●●●●4 of 5−0.068%−0.059%USD1
Worst recorded depegHow badly the token has broken before, as a stress precedent.●●●●4 of 5None recordedNone recordedTie
Track recordYears live and behaviour through past stress events.●●●●4 of 55353Tie
Scale / market capBigger float usually means broader venue support and tighter spreads.●●●3 of 5$1.56B$4.44BUSD1
Chain reachNumber of networks where the token is natively deployed.●●●3 of 54 chains8 chainsUSD1
Best available yieldUpside — but every extra point above T-bills is paid for with risk.●●2 of 58.00%8.00%Tie

"Matters" is our weighting of how much each dimension typically drives a real allocation decision. Sort any column to re-rank the tradeoffs by what matters to you.

The short answer

USD1 scores higher on safety (79 vs 72), driven mainly by collateral quality and disclosure. U has deeper tracked liquidity ($38.47B), which is what determines whether you can exit at size. U currently earns up to 8.00% — remember that any rate above the T-bill yield is payment for a risk.

If both are fiat-reserve tokens, note that holding both is not diversification: they share the same short-dated Treasury and banking exposure. Genuine diversification means mixing collateral structures.

Which one fits your goal: U or USD1?

Capital preservation over everything else.

For park cash safely, USD1 is the better fit over U.

  • Safety score 79 vs 72, with collateral rated 95/100.
  • Current peg deviation -0.059% against -0.068% for U.
  • No material depeg recorded for USD1 in our incident log.

Concentrating in one issuer is a single point of failure regardless of score. Split across collateral structures.

Key risks, side by side

U

  • Collateral volatility: a fast drawdown in backing assets can force liquidations.
  • No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
  • Limited public attestation of reserves.
  • Yield venue risk: 8.00% is earned outside the token itself.
  • Chain concentration: 71% of supply sits on BSC.

USD1

  • Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with World Liberty Financial under United States rules.
  • No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
  • Attestation cadence: monthly.
  • Yield venue risk: 8.00% is earned outside the token itself.
U compared with USD1
MetricUUSD1
CategoryStablecoinStablecoin
IssuerUndisclosedWorld Liberty Financial
JurisdictionNot documentedUnited States
Collateralcrypto-backedtreasuries
Peg mechanismcrypto-backedfiat-backed
Attestationnonemonthly
Redemptionmarket-onlygated
Price$0.9993$0.9994
Peg deviation−0.068%−0.059%
Market cap$1.56B$4.44B
7d supply change+5.18%+0.66%
Liquidity$38.47B$283.68M
Best yield8.00% (bitway-earn · BSC)8.00% (bitway-earn · BSC)
Chains48
Launched—2025
Worst recorded depegNone recordedNone recorded

Spread, peg gap and switching cost

Price spread (U vs USD1)
-0.9 bps
$0.9993 vs $0.9994
Peg deviation gap
0.009 pp
U −0.068% · USD1 −0.059%
Yield spread
+0.00%
U 8.00% · USD1 8.00%
Liquidity ratio
135.62×
$38.47B vs $283.68M

A round trip between U and USD1 costs roughly the market spread plus venue fees. At 0.9 bps of price gap, swapping $1M implies about $89.53 of price impact before fees — usually only worth it if the peg gap or yield spread is durable, not intraday noise.

Historical context

Track record is the part of a stablecoin you cannot model — it has to be observed. Here is how U and USD1 have actually behaved since launch, including every stress event we have on record.

  1. USD1

    World Liberty Financial USD goes live.

Chain coverage

U is live on 4 chains, USD1 on 8. 3 chains carry both, so bridging is only unavoidable for the 6 networks where just one of them is deployed.

U and USD1 supply by chain
ChainUUSD1Both available
BSC logoBSC$1.11B$1.39BYes
Ethereum logoEthereum$365.90M$1.60BYes
Solana logoSolana—$1.40BUSD1 only
Tron logoTron$54.96M$10.06MYes
Robinhood Chain logoRobinhood Chain$29.98M—U only
Aptos logoAptos—$20.00MUSD1 only
Abcore logoAbcore—$18.57MUSD1 only
Monad logoMonad—$35.3KUSD1 only
Plume Mainnet logoPlume Mainnet—$1.2KUSD1 only

U vs USD1: frequently asked questions

Is U or USD1 safer?

+

On our composite safety score USD1 rates 79/100 versus 72/100 for U. The score weighs collateral quality (treasuries vs crypto-backed), redemption rights, attestation quality, peg history and liquidity depth. A higher score is not a guarantee: both remain issuer-credit and smart-contract exposures, not insured bank deposits.

What is the difference between U and USD1?

+

United Stables is issued by Undisclosed (Not documented), backed by crypto-backed, with redemption terms: market-only. World Liberty Financial USD is issued by World Liberty Financial (United States), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. Attestation coverage is "none" for U and "monthly" for USD1.

Which has the bigger market cap, U or USD1?

+

USD1 is larger at $4.44B in circulating supply, against $1.56B for the other. Over the last 7 days supply moved +5.18% for U and +0.66% for USD1.

Are U and USD1 trading at $1.00 right now?

+

U trades at $0.9993 (−0.068% off peg) and USD1 at $0.9994 (−0.059% off peg). The gap between the two is about 0.9 basis points, which is the cost you pay when rotating size between them before fees.

Has U or USD1 ever depegged?

+

U: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. USD1: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. Past peg behaviour under stress is the single best available proxy for how a token trades in the next crisis.

Which is better for large institutional size, U or USD1?

+

For block size the constraint is exit liquidity and primary redemption, not headline supply. U shows deeper on-chain liquidity at $38.47B versus $283.68M. Combine that with the redemption channel — U: market-only; USD1: gated — and size trades against the primary window rather than the order book where possible.

Can I earn yield on U or USD1?

+

U currently shows the higher rate at 8.00% via bitway-earn · BSC, against 8.00% via bitway-earn · BSC for USD1. Neither token pays interest by holding it in a wallet: the yield comes from lending, liquidity provision or a wrapped yield-bearing version, each with its own counterparty and contract risk.

Which chains support both U and USD1?

+

Both are deployed on 3 shared networks, including BSC, Ethereum, Tron. U spans 4 chains in total and USD1 spans 8. Bridged supply on a chain is not the same as natively issued supply, and it usually carries the bridge's risk rather than the issuer's.

What does it cost to switch from U to USD1?

+

Budget three components: the current price spread of roughly 0.9 bps, swap or venue fees, and slippage against available depth ($38.47B for U, $283.68M for USD1). For meaningful size, redeeming with the issuer and minting the other side is often cheaper than a secondary-market swap.

Is U or USD1 regulated?

+

U is issued from Not documented with none; USD1 is issued from United States with monthly. Regulatory status varies by your own jurisdiction and by whether the token is offered under a specific stablecoin regime, so treat this as a starting point for diligence, not legal advice.