Skip to main content

XAUT vs PAXG

Both tokens represent one troy ounce of allocated LBMA gold. The difference is entirely in the wrapper: who supervises the issuer, who holds the bars, how often the holding is attested, and how many chains you can move on.

XAUT market cap
$3.19B
PAXG market cap
$1.95B
XAUT chains
3
PAXG chains
1
Tether Gold and PAX Gold compared attribute by attribute
AttributeXAUT — Tether GoldPAXG — PAX Gold
IssuerTG Commodities Limited (Tether)Paxos Trust Company
JurisdictionEl Salvador / Switzerland vaultingNew York, USA
Gold per token31.1035 g (1 troy oz)31.1035 g (1 troy oz)
VaultingAllocated LBMA-standard bars held in a Swiss vaultAllocated LBMA gold in Brink's London vaults
CustodianThird-party Swiss vault operatorBrink's
AuditorAttestation by Tether's reporting accountantIndependent third-party accounting firm
Audit cadenceQuarterly attestation, bar list publishedMonthly attestation plus NYDFS supervision
Physical redemptionYes — physical delivery in Switzerland for verified holdersYes — physical bars in London, or unallocated equivalents via partners
Redemption minimumOne full bar (roughly 430 oz equivalent) for physical delivery430 oz for full bars; smaller amounts redeemable to cash with partners
FeesNo custody fee; fees apply on issuance and physical redemptionNo storage fee; on-chain transfer fee charged by the issuer
ChainsEthereum, Tron, TONEthereum
Last verified2026-082026-08

Tether Gold (XAUT)

One token equals one troy ounce of allocated gold, with a published bar list that lets holders check the specific bars behind their tokens.

Risks

  • · Physical redemption is realistic only at full-bar size; retail holders exit through the market
  • · Attestation rather than a full audit of the vault operator
  • · Concentration in a single vaulting jurisdiction

PAX Gold (PAXG)

The regulated counterpart to XAUT: a New York trust company charter, monthly attestations and Brink's custody, at the cost of living on a single chain.

Risks

  • · Single-chain deployment limits venue choice and liquidity fragmentation options
  • · Issuer transfer fee makes very frequent movement expensive
  • · US regulatory exposure concentrates jurisdiction risk

XAUT vs PAXG, answered

+ Is XAUT or PAXG safer?

PAXG has the stronger regulatory wrapper: a New York trust company charter under NYDFS supervision, Brink's as custodian and monthly attestations. XAUT publishes a bar list and vaults in Switzerland, but attests quarterly and its issuer sits outside US or EU prudential supervision. Safety here is a question of who supervises the issuer, not of the metal.

+ Can I actually redeem physical gold?

Both allow it, and both effectively gate it at full-bar size — roughly 430 troy ounces. For retail-sized holdings the real exit is selling on the market, so secondary liquidity matters more than the redemption right.

+ Which is cheaper to hold?

Neither charges an ongoing custody fee. PAXG charges an on-chain transfer fee set by the issuer, which makes frequent movement expensive. XAUT charges on issuance and physical redemption instead. For a buy-and-hold position the difference is close to nil.

+ Does chain coverage matter?

Yes, for liquidity and cost. XAUT is deployed on Ethereum, Tron and TON, which gives cheaper transfer options; PAXG is Ethereum-only, which concentrates liquidity in one place but raises the cost of moving small amounts.

+ Is one token equal to one ounce for both?

Yes. Both represent 31.1035 grams — one troy ounce — of allocated LBMA-standard gold.

Related: all tokenized gold · treasuries & RWA · all comparisons

Informational only, not financial advice. Terms, fees and availability change frequently — always verify on the provider's own site before committing funds. Some outbound links may be partner links; they never affect ranking or scoring.