Both tokens represent one troy ounce of allocated LBMA gold. The difference is entirely in the wrapper: who supervises the issuer, who holds the bars, how often the holding is attested, and how many chains you can move on.
XAUT market cap
$3.19B
PAXG market cap
$1.95B
XAUT chains
3
PAXG chains
1
Tether Gold and PAX Gold compared attribute by attribute
Attribute
XAUT — Tether Gold
PAXG — PAX Gold
Issuer
TG Commodities Limited (Tether)
Paxos Trust Company
Jurisdiction
El Salvador / Switzerland vaulting
New York, USA
Gold per token
31.1035 g (1 troy oz)
31.1035 g (1 troy oz)
Vaulting
Allocated LBMA-standard bars held in a Swiss vault
Allocated LBMA gold in Brink's London vaults
Custodian
Third-party Swiss vault operator
Brink's
Auditor
Attestation by Tether's reporting accountant
Independent third-party accounting firm
Audit cadence
Quarterly attestation, bar list published
Monthly attestation plus NYDFS supervision
Physical redemption
Yes — physical delivery in Switzerland for verified holders
Yes — physical bars in London, or unallocated equivalents via partners
Redemption minimum
One full bar (roughly 430 oz equivalent) for physical delivery
430 oz for full bars; smaller amounts redeemable to cash with partners
Fees
No custody fee; fees apply on issuance and physical redemption
No storage fee; on-chain transfer fee charged by the issuer
Chains
Ethereum, Tron, TON
Ethereum
Last verified
2026-08
2026-08
Tether Gold (XAUT)
One token equals one troy ounce of allocated gold, with a published bar list that lets holders check the specific bars behind their tokens.
Risks
· Physical redemption is realistic only at full-bar size; retail holders exit through the market
· Attestation rather than a full audit of the vault operator
· Concentration in a single vaulting jurisdiction
PAX Gold (PAXG)
The regulated counterpart to XAUT: a New York trust company charter, monthly attestations and Brink's custody, at the cost of living on a single chain.
Risks
· Single-chain deployment limits venue choice and liquidity fragmentation options
· Issuer transfer fee makes very frequent movement expensive
· US regulatory exposure concentrates jurisdiction risk
XAUT vs PAXG, answered
+ − Is XAUT or PAXG safer?
PAXG has the stronger regulatory wrapper: a New York trust company charter under NYDFS supervision, Brink's as custodian and monthly attestations. XAUT publishes a bar list and vaults in Switzerland, but attests quarterly and its issuer sits outside US or EU prudential supervision. Safety here is a question of who supervises the issuer, not of the metal.
+ − Can I actually redeem physical gold?
Both allow it, and both effectively gate it at full-bar size — roughly 430 troy ounces. For retail-sized holdings the real exit is selling on the market, so secondary liquidity matters more than the redemption right.
+ − Which is cheaper to hold?
Neither charges an ongoing custody fee. PAXG charges an on-chain transfer fee set by the issuer, which makes frequent movement expensive. XAUT charges on issuance and physical redemption instead. For a buy-and-hold position the difference is close to nil.
+ − Does chain coverage matter?
Yes, for liquidity and cost. XAUT is deployed on Ethereum, Tron and TON, which gives cheaper transfer options; PAXG is Ethereum-only, which concentrates liquidity in one place but raises the cost of moving small amounts.
+ − Is one token equal to one ounce for both?
Yes. Both represent 31.1035 grams — one troy ounce — of allocated LBMA-standard gold.
Informational only, not financial advice. Terms, fees and availability change frequently — always verify on the provider's own site before committing funds. Some outbound links may be partner links; they never affect ranking or scoring.