CHIP vs CIRCLE USYC
USD AI and Circle USYC, compared on the things that decide whether you get your dollar back. Live data, updated continuously.
30-day peg gap and CHIP/CIRCLE USYC spread
Loading price history…
USD AI issues dollar-denominated tokenized real-world assets across 1 chains. Value shown is on-chain assets under management.
Verdict band: Adequate
Circle USYC issues dollar-denominated tokenized real-world assets across 2 chains. Value shown is on-chain assets under management.
Verdict band: Adequate
| Safety scoreComposite of collateral, peg, liquidity, issuer and track record. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 63 | 66 | CIRCLE USYC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collateral qualityWhat actually backs the token, and how liquid that backing is. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 55 | 55 | Tie |
| Exit liquidityWhether you can leave at size without moving the price. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | $0.00 | $0.00 | Tie |
| Issuer & legal standingRegulatory perimeter, disclosure quality and redemption rights. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 48 | 48 | Tie |
| Peg tightness (live)Absolute distance from $1.00 right now — smaller is better. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 0.000% | 0.000% | Tie |
| Worst recorded depegHow badly the token has broken before, as a stress precedent. | ●●●●4 of 5 | None recorded | None recorded | Tie |
| Track recordYears live and behaviour through past stress events. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 53 | 53 | Tie |
| Scale / market capBigger float usually means broader venue support and tighter spreads. | ●●●3 of 5 | $288.92M | $2.60B | CIRCLE USYC |
| Chain reachNumber of networks where the token is natively deployed. | ●●●3 of 5 | 1 chains | 2 chains | CIRCLE USYC |
| Best available yieldUpside — but every extra point above T-bills is paid for with risk. | ●●2 of 5 | None | None | Tie |
"Matters" is our weighting of how much each dimension typically drives a real allocation decision. Sort any column to re-rank the tradeoffs by what matters to you.
The short answer
CIRCLE USYC scores higher on safety (66 vs 63), driven mainly by collateral quality and disclosure. CHIP has deeper tracked liquidity ($0.00), which is what determines whether you can exit at size.
If both are fiat-reserve tokens, note that holding both is not diversification: they share the same short-dated Treasury and banking exposure. Genuine diversification means mixing collateral structures.
Which one fits your goal: CHIP or CIRCLE USYC?
Capital preservation over everything else.
For park cash safely, CIRCLE USYC edges out CHIP — but it is close enough that either works.
- Safety score 66 vs 63, with collateral rated 55/100.
- Current peg deviation 0.000% against 0.000% for CHIP.
- No material depeg recorded for CIRCLE USYC in our incident log.
Concentrating in one issuer is a single point of failure regardless of score. Split across collateral structures.
Key risks, side by side
CHIP
- Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with USD AI under Not documented rules.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Attestation cadence: monthly.
- Chain concentration: 100% of supply sits on Arbitrum.
CIRCLE USYC
- Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with Circle USYC under Not documented rules.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Attestation cadence: monthly.
- Chain concentration: 98% of supply sits on Binance.
| Metric | CHIP | CIRCLE USYC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Tokenized Treasury | Tokenized Treasury |
| Issuer | USD AI | Circle USYC |
| Jurisdiction | Not documented | Not documented |
| Collateral | treasuries | treasuries |
| Peg mechanism | asset-backed | asset-backed |
| Attestation | monthly | monthly |
| Redemption | gated | gated |
| Price | $1.0000 | $1.0000 |
| Peg deviation | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Market cap | $288.92M | $2.60B |
| 7d supply change | +25.29% | −3.76% |
| Liquidity | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Best yield | None | None |
| Chains | 1 | 2 |
| Launched | — | — |
| Worst recorded depeg | None recorded | None recorded |
Spread, peg gap and switching cost
- Price spread (CHIP vs CIRCLE USYC)
- +0.0 bps
- $1.0000 vs $1.0000
- Peg deviation gap
- 0.000 pp
- CHIP 0.000% · CIRCLE USYC 0.000%
- Yield spread
- +0.00%
- CHIP — · CIRCLE USYC —
- Liquidity ratio
- —
- $0.00 vs $0.00
A round trip between CHIP and CIRCLE USYC costs roughly the market spread plus venue fees. At 0.0 bps of price gap, swapping $1M implies about $0.00 of price impact before fees — usually only worth it if the peg gap or yield spread is durable, not intraday noise.
Chain coverage
CHIP is live on 1 chains, CIRCLE USYC on 2. 0 chains carry both, so bridging is only unavoidable for the 3 networks where just one of them is deployed.
| Chain | CHIP | CIRCLE USYC | Both available |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | $2.56B | CIRCLE USYC only | |
| $288.92M | — | CHIP only | |
| — | $42.03M | CIRCLE USYC only |
CHIP vs CIRCLE USYC: frequently asked questions
Is CHIP or CIRCLE USYC safer?
+
On our composite safety score CIRCLE USYC rates 66/100 versus 63/100 for CHIP. The score weighs collateral quality (treasuries vs treasuries), redemption rights, attestation quality, peg history and liquidity depth. A higher score is not a guarantee: both remain issuer-credit and smart-contract exposures, not insured bank deposits.
What is the difference between CHIP and CIRCLE USYC?
+
USD AI is issued by USD AI (Not documented), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. Circle USYC is issued by Circle USYC (Not documented), backed by treasuries, with redemption terms: gated. Attestation coverage is "monthly" for CHIP and "monthly" for CIRCLE USYC.
Which has the bigger market cap, CHIP or CIRCLE USYC?
+
CIRCLE USYC is larger at $2.60B in circulating supply, against $288.92M for the other. Over the last 7 days supply moved +25.29% for CHIP and −3.76% for CIRCLE USYC.
Are CHIP and CIRCLE USYC trading at $1.00 right now?
+
CHIP trades at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg) and CIRCLE USYC at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg). The gap between the two is about 0.0 basis points, which is the cost you pay when rotating size between them before fees.
Has CHIP or CIRCLE USYC ever depegged?
+
CHIP: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. CIRCLE USYC: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. Past peg behaviour under stress is the single best available proxy for how a token trades in the next crisis.
Which is better for large institutional size, CHIP or CIRCLE USYC?
+
For block size the constraint is exit liquidity and primary redemption, not headline supply. CHIP shows deeper on-chain liquidity at $0.00 versus $0.00. Combine that with the redemption channel — CHIP: gated; CIRCLE USYC: gated — and size trades against the primary window rather than the order book where possible.
Can I earn yield on CHIP or CIRCLE USYC?
+
Neither CHIP nor CIRCLE USYC currently has a tracked yield venue in our dataset. Holding either in a wallet pays nothing; any advertised rate comes from lending or liquidity provision on top, with its own risk.
Which chains support both CHIP and CIRCLE USYC?
+
They currently share no common network in our data: CHIP is deployed on 1 chain(s) and CIRCLE USYC on 2. Moving between them requires a bridge or a centralised venue.
What does it cost to switch from CHIP to CIRCLE USYC?
+
Budget three components: the current price spread of roughly 0.0 bps, swap or venue fees, and slippage against available depth ($0.00 for CHIP, $0.00 for CIRCLE USYC). For meaningful size, redeeming with the issuer and minting the other side is often cheaper than a secondary-market swap.
Is CHIP or CIRCLE USYC regulated?
+
CHIP is issued from Not documented with monthly; CIRCLE USYC is issued from Not documented with monthly. Regulatory status varies by your own jurisdiction and by whether the token is offered under a specific stablecoin regime, so treat this as a starting point for diligence, not legal advice.