USDQ vs USDV
Quantoz USDQ and Valtorum USD, compared on the things that decide whether you get your dollar back. Live data, updated continuously.
30-day peg gap and USDQ/USDV spread
Loading price history…
Quantoz USDQ is a dollar-denominated token tracked across 4 chains. No verified issuer disclosure is on file, so its collateral and legal structure score conservatively.
Verdict band: Caution
Valtorum USD is a dollar-denominated token tracked across 6 chains. No verified issuer disclosure is on file, so its collateral and legal structure score conservatively.
Verdict band: Adequate
| Safety scoreComposite of collateral, peg, liquidity, issuer and track record. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 54 | 71 | USDV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collateral qualityWhat actually backs the token, and how liquid that backing is. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | 55 | 55 | Tie |
| Exit liquidityWhether you can leave at size without moving the price. | ●●●●●5 of 5 | $0.00 | $317.21M | USDV |
| Issuer & legal standingRegulatory perimeter, disclosure quality and redemption rights. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 48 | 48 | Tie |
| Peg tightness (live)Absolute distance from $1.00 right now — smaller is better. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 0.000% | 0.000% | Tie |
| Worst recorded depegHow badly the token has broken before, as a stress precedent. | ●●●●4 of 5 | None recorded | None recorded | Tie |
| Track recordYears live and behaviour through past stress events. | ●●●●4 of 5 | 53 | 53 | Tie |
| Scale / market capBigger float usually means broader venue support and tighter spreads. | ●●●3 of 5 | $8.09M | $110.96M | USDV |
| Chain reachNumber of networks where the token is natively deployed. | ●●●3 of 5 | 4 chains | 6 chains | USDV |
| Best available yieldUpside — but every extra point above T-bills is paid for with risk. | ●●2 of 5 | None | None | Tie |
"Matters" is our weighting of how much each dimension typically drives a real allocation decision. Sort any column to re-rank the tradeoffs by what matters to you.
The short answer
USDV scores higher on safety (71 vs 54), driven mainly by collateral quality and disclosure. USDV has deeper tracked liquidity ($317.21M), which is what determines whether you can exit at size.
If both are fiat-reserve tokens, note that holding both is not diversification: they share the same short-dated Treasury and banking exposure. Genuine diversification means mixing collateral structures.
Which one fits your goal: USDQ or USDV?
Capital preservation over everything else.
For park cash safely, USDV is the better fit over USDQ.
- Safety score 71 vs 54, with collateral rated 55/100.
- Current peg deviation 0.000% against 0.000% for USDQ.
- No material depeg recorded for USDV in our incident log.
Concentrating in one issuer is a single point of failure regardless of score. Split across collateral structures.
Key risks, side by side
USDQ
- Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with Undisclosed under Not documented rules.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Limited public attestation of reserves.
- Chain concentration: 87% of supply sits on Ethereum.
USDV
- Issuer and banking risk: reserves sit with Undisclosed under Not documented rules.
- No depeg recorded in our incident log — absence of history is not a guarantee.
- Limited public attestation of reserves.
- Chain concentration: 76% of supply sits on XRPL.
| Metric | USDQ | USDV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Stablecoin | Stablecoin |
| Issuer | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Jurisdiction | Not documented | Not documented |
| Collateral | fiat-backed | fiat-backed |
| Peg mechanism | fiat-backed | fiat-backed |
| Attestation | none | none |
| Redemption | market-only | market-only |
| Price | $1.0000 | $1.0000 |
| Peg deviation | 0.000% | 0.000% |
| Market cap | $8.09M | $110.96M |
| 7d supply change | 0.00% | −2.63% |
| Liquidity | $0.00 | $317.21M |
| Best yield | None | None |
| Chains | 4 | 6 |
| Launched | — | — |
| Worst recorded depeg | None recorded | None recorded |
Spread, peg gap and switching cost
- Price spread (USDQ vs USDV)
- +0.0 bps
- $1.0000 vs $1.0000
- Peg deviation gap
- 0.000 pp
- USDQ 0.000% · USDV 0.000%
- Yield spread
- +0.00%
- USDQ — · USDV —
- Liquidity ratio
- 0.00×
- $0.00 vs $317.21M
A round trip between USDQ and USDV costs roughly the market spread plus venue fees. At 0.0 bps of price gap, swapping $1M implies about $0.00 of price impact before fees — usually only worth it if the peg gap or yield spread is durable, not intraday noise.
Chain coverage
USDQ is live on 4 chains, USDV on 6. 2 chains carry both, so bridging is only unavoidable for the 6 networks where just one of them is deployed.
| Chain | USDQ | USDV | Both available |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.00M | $84.27M | Yes | |
| — | $10.19M | USDV only | |
| — | $10.15M | USDV only | |
| $7.00M | — | USDQ only | |
| $1.5K | $4.56M | Yes | |
| — | $1.10M | USDV only | |
| — | $700.0K | USDV only | |
| $88.3K | — | USDQ only |
USDQ vs USDV: frequently asked questions
Is USDQ or USDV safer?
+
On our composite safety score USDV rates 71/100 versus 54/100 for USDQ. The score weighs collateral quality (fiat-backed vs fiat-backed), redemption rights, attestation quality, peg history and liquidity depth. A higher score is not a guarantee: both remain issuer-credit and smart-contract exposures, not insured bank deposits.
What is the difference between USDQ and USDV?
+
Quantoz USDQ is issued by Undisclosed (Not documented), backed by fiat-backed, with redemption terms: market-only. Valtorum USD is issued by Undisclosed (Not documented), backed by fiat-backed, with redemption terms: market-only. Attestation coverage is "none" for USDQ and "none" for USDV.
Which has the bigger market cap, USDQ or USDV?
+
USDV is larger at $110.96M in circulating supply, against $8.09M for the other. Over the last 7 days supply moved 0.00% for USDQ and −2.63% for USDV.
Are USDQ and USDV trading at $1.00 right now?
+
USDQ trades at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg) and USDV at $1.0000 (0.000% off peg). The gap between the two is about 0.0 basis points, which is the cost you pay when rotating size between them before fees.
Has USDQ or USDV ever depegged?
+
USDQ: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. USDV: no material depeg recorded in our incident set. Past peg behaviour under stress is the single best available proxy for how a token trades in the next crisis.
Which is better for large institutional size, USDQ or USDV?
+
For block size the constraint is exit liquidity and primary redemption, not headline supply. USDV shows deeper on-chain liquidity at $317.21M versus $0.00. Combine that with the redemption channel — USDQ: market-only; USDV: market-only — and size trades against the primary window rather than the order book where possible.
Can I earn yield on USDQ or USDV?
+
Neither USDQ nor USDV currently has a tracked yield venue in our dataset. Holding either in a wallet pays nothing; any advertised rate comes from lending or liquidity provision on top, with its own risk.
Which chains support both USDQ and USDV?
+
Both are deployed on 2 shared networks, including XRPL, Polygon. USDQ spans 4 chains in total and USDV spans 6. Bridged supply on a chain is not the same as natively issued supply, and it usually carries the bridge's risk rather than the issuer's.
What does it cost to switch from USDQ to USDV?
+
Budget three components: the current price spread of roughly 0.0 bps, swap or venue fees, and slippage against available depth ($0.00 for USDQ, $317.21M for USDV). For meaningful size, redeeming with the issuer and minting the other side is often cheaper than a secondary-market swap.
Is USDQ or USDV regulated?
+
USDQ is issued from Not documented with none; USDV is issued from Not documented with none. Regulatory status varies by your own jurisdiction and by whether the token is offered under a specific stablecoin regime, so treat this as a starting point for diligence, not legal advice.